Telemarketing Connections. Our newsletter that is free Connections, provides a very important snapshot of the very most prompt dilemmas of concern into the industry.

Telemarketing Connections. Our newsletter that is free Connections, provides a very important snapshot of the very most prompt dilemmas of concern into the industry.

Copilevitz & Canter’s free publication, Telemarketing Connections, supplies an invaluable snapshot of this many prompt dilemmas of concern towards the industry.

Telemarketing Connections Newsletter

Our newsletter that is free Connections, provides an invaluable snapshot of the most extremely prompt dilemmas of concern into the industry.

Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has required general public remark regarding just just how it should control illegal robocalls to hospitals. Feedback are due by 1, 2021 february. See

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has posted brand brand new penalty that is civil for violations of its legislation including actions for unjust misleading trade methods often utilized in telemarketing cases. The penalty that is maximum breach for the unjust misleading work happens to be $43,280. See .

Comment: If the FTC considers each call to become a breach, these penalties that are civil be ruinous. Therefore it is crucial to examine conformity with all the Telemarketing product product product Sales Rule although it is not likely to be utilized in a civil class action such as the phone customer Protection Act (“TCPA”) therefore commonly is.


A Florida court has enforced an arbitration agreement against a plaintiff whom defaulted on a car loan, then alleged calls to gather the car loan violated the Fair Debt Collection techniques Act (“FDCPA”) while the TCPA. Grand v. Fast Automobile Financing, Inc.

Remark: It is vital your agreements with customers have enforceable arbitration clauses to stop nuisance and worse, TCPA allegations. Please contact me personally us to review your contracts with regard to this issue if you would like.


A court has denied an expert se TCPA plaintiff’s claim to help you to register their suit underneath the TCPA and FDCPA without having the filing cost. Strange v. Juiceman.


Another regular TCPA plaintiff Michael Worsham has lost a claim against Discount energy, Inc. Worsham v. Discount Energy, Inc. The defendant argued their 17-count problem according to seven telephone phone telephone calls neglected to state a claim in breach associated with the TCPA or perhaps the Maryland phone customer Protection Act because he asserted “absolutely no facts to aid [the] allegation that [defendant] used an [automatic telephone dialing system].”

Comment: Worsham is just a disbarred lawyer who now files pro se situations by himself behalf.


a nevada cannabis dispensary happens to be a defendant in a TCPA class action after it texted customers that has supplied their cell phone number towards the company if they visited to get cannabis. Stanley, et al. v. Terratech.

Comment: If, as alleged, the plaintiffs offered their number as a disorder to go into the shop, it’s not previous express permission since the quantity had been supplied to not facilitate interaction however for another restricted function. In the event that you plan to rely on this type of previous express permission, you ought to make certain you usually do not produce limitation that will enable a plaintiff to claim a supply towards the cell phone number is not previous express permission.

Brand New Hampshire

The brand new Hampshire home is considering a bill (HB 510) which will change the state’s automated telephone dialing unit statute to permit prerecorded calls just for crisis purposes or with previous consent that is express.

New York

A bill is proposed within the ny Senate (SB 1349) which will require companies make accessible to customers totally free access to all customers’ private information retained because of the business in the event that company provides that private information to your alternative party. The limitation is certainly not limited by organizations that sell customer information, i.e. any kind of sharing would trigger the notice requirement.


A judge has permitted a fraudulence counter-claim to continue against Craig Cunningham, a frequent TCPA pro se plaintiff. Cunningham v. United States Of America Auto Protection. The defendant alleged plaintiff made “material and constant false representations … that he intended [defendant] to are based upon. which he knew had been false and”

Comment: Plaintiffs frequently will “play along” with telephone telephone calls supplying false information to create later on calls. This situation could possibly be a defense that is important such situations.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *